YOUR QUESTIONS AND OUR ANSWERS:
| - IS IT TRUE THAT ARCHAEORAPTOR LIAONINGENSIS, PROPOSED AS A "DINO-BIRD" WAS A FRAUD? |
Yes. The fossil, consisting of bone and stone held together using glue and plaster, was made by adding a dinosaur tail to a bird body. The fossil, described in the press as evidence for so-called evolution, was declared to be "dino-bird waffle" two years later. National Geographic's great hit, the perfect "dino-bird" Archaeoraptor soon turned out to be a hoax. All other "dino-bird" candidates remain speculative.
|
| For more information: http://www.harunyahya.com/refuted6.php |
|
| - IS IT TRUE THAT PILTDOWN MAN WAS A HOAX? |
Yes. Piltdown Man, portrayed for 43 years as highly significant evidence confirming evolution, turned out to be a hoax. In 1953, investigations into the skull revealed that Piltdown Man was no fossil, but a forgery produced by combining human and orangutan bones. A 500-year-old human cranium was joined onto an orangutan jaw and then stained with potassium dichromate to give it an aged appearance.
|
| For more information: http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php |
|
| - IS IT TRUE THAT PAST CIVILIZATIONS DEPICTED AS PRIMITIVE ACTUALLY USED HIGHLY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND POSSESSED AN UNSURPASSED CONCEPTION OF ART? |
Yes. The idea of semi-ape and semi-human creatures, savage cavemen, devoid of the power of speech and able only to grunt, incapable of standing on two legs, is propaganda aimed at deceiving the public. The fact is that the people described as ape-men sailed over the oceans on well-built ships, drew pictures with the same ability and aesthetic awareness as contemporary artists, made musical instruments and took pleasure from the clothes they wore.
|
| For more information: http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/stoneage/stoneage02.php |
|
|
