DARWINISTS,

YOU CAN ASK US ANY QUESTIONS IN YOUR MIND ON THE THEORY OF EVOLUTION. YOUR ANSWERS WILL SOON BE PUBLISHED HERE:

SEND YOUR QUESTIONS TO: info @ darwinists ask us.com.


YOUR QUESTIONS AND OUR ANSWERS:

- IS IT TRUE THAT ARCHAEORAPTOR LIAONINGENSIS, PROPOSED AS A "DINO-BIRD" WAS A FRAUD?
Yes. The fossil, consisting of bone and stone held together using glue and plaster, was made by adding a dinosaur tail to a bird body. The fossil, described in the press as evidence for so-called evolution, was declared to be "dino-bird waffle" two years later. National Geographic's great hit, the perfect "dino-bird" Archaeoraptor soon turned out to be a hoax. All other "dino-bird" candidates remain speculative.
For more information: http://harunyahya.com/en/Articles/14815/Darwinists-latest-desperate-efforts-to-keep-the-Dino-bird-deception-alive

- IS IT TRUE THAT PILTDOWN MAN WAS A HOAX?
Yes. Piltdown Man, portrayed for 43 years as highly significant evidence confirming evolution, turned out to be a hoax. In 1953, investigations into the skull revealed that Piltdown Man was no fossil, but a forgery produced by combining human and orangutan bones. A 500-year-old human cranium was joined onto an orangutan jaw and then stained with potassium dichromate to give it an aged appearance.
For more information: http://www.evolutiondeceit.com/chapter9.php

- IS IT TRUE THAT PAST CIVILIZATIONS DEPICTED AS PRIMITIVE ACTUALLY USED HIGHLY ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY AND POSSESSED AN UNSURPASSED CONCEPTION OF ART?
Yes. The idea of semi-ape and semi-human creatures, savage cavemen, devoid of the power of speech and able only to grunt, incapable of standing on two legs, is propaganda aimed at deceiving the public. The fact is that the people described as ape-men sailed over the oceans on well-built ships, drew pictures with the same ability and aesthetic awareness as contemporary artists, made musical instruments and took pleasure from the clothes they wore.
For more information: http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/stoneage/stoneage02.php
 
 
Darwinism Watch
Why is the New York Times' claim about the creation of an artificial human genome unreasonable? 2016-06-06  
A new attempt for a fake transitional form by the Journal Nature: Tyrannosaur Euotica 2016-04-01  
PLoS ONE Journal Fails to Stand Against the Power of Atheist Propaganda and Darwinist Dictatorship 2016-03-25  
The Ancestors of Armadillos Were also Armadillos 2016-03-11  
What Does the Fact That We Share the Same Diseases with Neanderthals Mean? 2016-03-02  
The Evolutionist Scenario over “Homo naledi” Has Come to Nothing 2015-09-23  
The Myth of Evolution Again from the Top: “Let life start without protein, but not without sugar” 2015-06-17  
A 80 million year old rare frilled shark fossil found in Australia speaks against Darwinism 2015-03-28  
The Darwinist idea that ‘Humans are no different to animal species’ is incorrect 2015-03-28  
Why are www.theguardian.com and other Darwinists mistaken? 2015-03-28  
   

Read all responses to the Darwinist propaganda >>

 
 
 

 

This site is based on the works of Harun Yahya.